Clinical Outcomes of Additional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Assessed with the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire

Abstract

Study Design A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Background The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) has been recently reported to be the most responsive assessment tool for lumbar spinal stenosis among the ZCQ, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, the visual analog scale, the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the EuroQol 5 dimensions 5 level. There has been no study comparing surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after previous PLIF with those of primary PLIF.

Objective We compared the clinical outcomes of additional PLIF for unstable ASD after previous PLIF with those of primary PLIF assessed with the ZCQ to examine whether surgical outcomes of additional PLIF for ASD following previous PLIF are inferior to those of primary PLIF.

Methods Thirteen consecutive patients undergoing additional single-level PLIF for unstable ASD after previous PLIF (A group) and 61 consecutive patients undergoing primary single-level PLIF (P group) were included in the study. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the ZCQ before PLIF surgery and at 2 years postoperatively. Achievement rates of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of each domain (symptom severity [SS] and physical function [PF]) on the ZCQ were evaluated in each group.

Results In the A group, the mean SS and PF before additional PLIF were 3.615 and 3.1, respectively, which significantly improved to 2.231 and 2.0, respectively, at 2 years after surgery. In the P group, the mean SS and PF before primary PLIF were 3.438 and 2.5, respectively, which also significantly improved to 2.194 and 1.6, respectively, at 2 years postoperatively. PF before additional PLIF in the A group was significantly inferior to that in the P group, but SS both before and after PLIF and PF at 2 years postoperatively showed no significant differences between the two groups. The achievement rates of the MCID of SS and PF were 92.3 and 76.9%, respectively, in the A group and 59.0 and 59.0%, respectively, in the P group. The MCID achievement rates of SS was significantly higher in the A group than in the P group.

Conclusion Assessed with the ZCQ at 2 years after surgery, the clinical outcomes of additional single-level PLIF for unstable ASD after previous PLIF were equivalent to those of primary single-level PLIF.

Keywords

clinical outcomes - the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire - posterior lumbar interbody fusion - adjacent segment disease

Ethical Approval

The protocol of this study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital (approval number: 31).

Consent for Publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Note

The authors represent that the article is original, that it is not under consideration by another journal, and that it has not been previously published.

Publication History

Received: 05 March 2024

Accepted: 14 August 2024

Article published online:
09 June 2025

• References

• 1 Arts MP, Kols NI, Onderwater SM, Peul WC. Clinical outcome of instrumented fusion for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: a case series of 100 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (07) 1213-1217
• 2 Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996; 21 (07) 796-803
• 3 Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000; 25 (22) 2940-2952 , discussion 2952
• 4 Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M. et al; Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation. JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. April 16, 2007. J Orthop Sci 2009; 14 (03) 348-365
• 5 Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11) 1037-1044
• 6 Shiroiwa T, Ikeda S, Noto S. et al. Comparison of value set based on DCE and/or TTO data: scoring for EQ-5D–5L health states in Japan. Value Health 2016; 19 (05) 648-654
• 7 Fujimori T, Ikegami D, Sugiura T, Sakaura H. Responsiveness of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the EuroQol 5 dimensions 5 level in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2022; 31 (06) 1399-1412
• 8 Fukushima M, Oka H, Oshima Y. et al. Evaluation of the minimum clinically important differences of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Spine Surg 2020; 33 (10) E499-E503
• 9 Chen WJ, Lai PL, Niu CC, Chen LH, Fu TS, Wong CB. Surgical treatment of adjacent instability after lumbar spine fusion. Spine 2001; 26 (22) E519-E524
• 10 Miwa T, Sakaura H, Yamashita T, Suzuki S, Ohwada T. Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (12) 2864-2868
• 11 Louie PK, Haws BE, Khan JM. et al. Comparison of stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus open laminectomy and posterolateral instrumented fusion in the treatment of adjacent segment disease following previous lumbar fusion surgery. Spine 2019; 44 (24) E1461-E1469
• 12 Miscusi M, Trungu S, Ricciardi L. et al. Stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after previous posterior lumbar fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes and comparison with posterior revision surgery. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (08) 2985
• 13 Wertli MM, Steurer J, Wildi LM, Held U. Cross-cultural adaptation of the German version of the spinal stenosis measure. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (06) 1309-1319
• 14 Bouknaitir JB, Carreon LY, Brorson S, Andersen MØ. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Global Spine J 2022; 12 (01) 53-60
• 15 Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004; 29 (17) 1938-1944